PhD Progress

When I run project management workshops, there’s always one problem that everyone struggles with: how on earth do you estimate the time needed for each task? Most of us either overlook the complexities of an apparently straightforward activity, or simply forget that it always takes much longer than we imagine. As researchers, we vow to devise a better data-driven solution, but that’ll be for the next project. Time Tracking One of the best solutions I’ve discovered is time tracking. Working on freelance projects, I sometimes need to track billable hours for clients. With time tracking tools like Toggl, you record the start and end time for activities so you can generate reports on exactly how long you spent on that project. Within the project, you use tags or labels to track specific activities, such as emails, meetings, or researching. I use Toggl1 because it’s easy record everything with the desktop timer, which also supports the Pomodoro Technique. Alternatives include Clockify and RescueTime. ...

Here are the resources for my workshop on Project Managing Your Research. Books 📚 How to Lead Smart People by Arun Singh & Mike Mister Making Work Visible by Dominica DeGrandis Slow Productivity by Cal Newport Sprint: How to Solve Big Problems and Test New Ideas in Just 5 Days by Jake Knapp The 12 Week Year by Brian P. Moran & Michael Lennington Words that Change Minds by Shelle Rose Charvet Apps 💻 Toggl Focus Trello Resources 🧭 Time Tracking for Researchers: Improve Your Project Management with Data-Driven Planning Risk Assessment Matrix The Eisenhower Matrix The Human Function Curve

The Risk Assessment Matrix is a fundamental (but scary) tool for evaluating and prioritising project risks based on two dimensions: Vertical Axis - Probability: How likely is this event to occur? Horizontal Axis - Impact: If this event does occur, how severe would the consequences be? Or, how much disruption would it cause? The Risk Assessment Matrix As project manager, part of your job is to consider the potential risks and in which quadrant they belong. It’s helpful to already have a breakdown of your project deliverables and tasks before you start. ...

How many times do we make a note to “Work on project”? It’s no wonder we feel overwhelmed and start diligently responding to email instead. Six months later, we’ve got a gold star for responsiveness but have missed that important milestone. Answering emails won’t get you the research funding or the promotion. The answer is to breakdown that project into smaller, actionable tasks. The Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) helps you define the total scope of a project by breaking it down from the highest level (the project itself) to the lowest level (individual tasks that can be assigned and tracked). ...

Here are the recommended resources for my workshop on Planning and Structuring Your Literature Review. Books 📚 How to Read a Book by Mortimer J. Adler Writing for Social Scientists by Howard S. Becker How to Write a Thesis by Rowena Murray The Literature Review by Diana Ridley The Unwritten Rules of PhD Research by Gordon Rugg & Marian Petre Writing Science by Joshua Schimel Stylish Academic Writing by Helen Sword Detox Your Writing: Strategies for Doctoral Researchers by Pat Thomson & Barbara Kamler Succeeding with Your Doctorate by Wellington et al Websites 🕸️ The Thesis Whisperer The Academic Phrasebank Videos 📺 James Hayton PhD ...

A few years ago, I sent a friend a book chapter I’d been working on for months. Desperate for validation, I waited anxiously for a response. As the days passed, I convinced myself he hated it. Obviously, he was putting off telling me how bad it was. Two weeks later, the email arrived … with an attachment. My friend had completely rewritten the chapter. Not only that, he’d used tracked changes in Word, so it was a sea of red. As you can imagine, my heart plunged into my boots. I’d wanted him to say, “Goodness, Catherine, you’ve worked really hard on this. Well done.” As I hadn’t explained my requirement, he’d assumed I wanted extensive editorial input. ...

At the moment, it’s easy to think there’s very little that’s within our control. Unfortunately, we’re right. However, this makes it even more important to focus on what we can control. In The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People, Stephen R. Covey separates our lives into three concentric circles: control, concern, and influence. The Circle of Control The Circle of Control includes events we control directly. In the Circle of Influence, we find those areas where we have some control but are also partly affected by the behaviour of other people. Finally, the Circle of Concern is everything that affects us, yet we’re powerless to change it: economic uncertainty, in-laws, and spiteful weather. ...

If there’s one topic guaranteed to suck all the fun out of a writing workshop, it’s signposting. Signposts include descriptive headings, cross-references, and emphasis of argument. For the writer, these mechanisms feel clunky and dull; for the reader, though, these navigational aids make the text much more digestible — especially when it’s a long document like a thesis or a monograph. Your reader or examiner is probably reading your work alongside a whole heap of other research material. They’ll be dipping in and out over weeks — maybe even months — so need frequent reminders of what you’ve already told them and a roadmap of what’s coming next. With a clear structure and frequent signposts, they’re much less likely to miss something important. ...

It’s hard to get a sense of a big piece of writing, especially when Word keeps crashing. You’re scrolling endlessly, trying to hold thousands of words in your tired brain. You need to step away from the screen. In this blog post, I’ll explain how you can map your book or thesis. This technique helps you impose order on a baggy draft. Even better, it provides an excuse to buy stationery. ...

Even when we start out with a clear plan, it’s easy to end up with rambling draft. We know there’s an argument lurking within, but we’re darned if we can find it. While every writer is different, nearly everyone benefits from the technique of reverse outlining. I think it’s the best way to improve the flow of your argument and produce a coherent manuscript or thesis. There are many different approaches to this technique and there’s no right way of doing it. I’ll share my approach with you, which you can then adapt. ...