<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>PhD Progress on Catherine Pope</title>
    <link>https://catherinepope.com/tags/phd-progress/</link>
    <description>Recent content in PhD Progress on Catherine Pope</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.148.2</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 16:59:06 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://catherinepope.com/tags/phd-progress/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Assessing Ideas with Sequential Elimination</title>
      <link>https://catherinepope.com/posts/assessing-ideas-with-sequential-elimination/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 16:36:35 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://catherinepope.com/posts/assessing-ideas-with-sequential-elimination/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;As someone who has around 500 ideas a day, I needed a way of assessing those ideas more systematically. Most of them &lt;em&gt;seem&lt;/em&gt; exciting, but pursing dozens of projects is a shortcut to burnout. How on earth do I choose one? Well, the answer turned out to be &amp;ldquo;sequential elimination&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best known as a voting system, the sequential elimination method works by repeatedly eliminating the losing candidate until a single winner remains. Instead of asking myself, &amp;ldquo;Am I excited by this idea?&amp;rdquo; I subject the potential project to rigorous questioning, rating my responses on a scale of 1-10.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
